Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!princeton!phoenix!kadickey
From: kadickey@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Kent Andrew Dickey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: NuPak 2.0
Message-ID: <14458@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 12 Mar 90 19:22:37 GMT
References: <25fb4fd0.5f7@petunia.CalPoly.EDU> <104*delaneyg@wnre.aecl.ca>
Reply-To: kadickey@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Kent Andrew Dickey)
Organization: Princeton University, NJ
Lines: 21

In article <104*delaneyg@wnre.aecl.ca> delaneyg@wnre.aecl.ca (Grant Delaney) writes:
>This is like taking the work of other's and trying to make a buck on it.  All
>the work on shrinkit (which this is obviously based on) has been done by 
>Andy.  Let use not forget the problems that ANDY went through to 
>start to go for a comercial product with L & L.  The only thing you appear
>to be getting it stuffit.  My suggestion is send the money to Andy he did 
>most of the work anyway.  Remember the Great Flap before!!!
>
>Grant Delaney

This NuPak thing looks like a really bad deal...
Andy has been working very hard on ShrinkIt 3.0, and GS/ShrinkIt....
this competition might be enough to make Andy stop his work.  It's a bad
feeling in business when a competitor beats you out with a product, but
this is even worse since Andy has been doing it for FREE!

I just hope this NuPak doesn't steal any of Andy's code...that would be
really lame.

			Kent Dickey
kadickey@phoenix.Princeton.EDU