Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!Apple.COM!lsr
From: lsr@Apple.COM (Larry Rosenstein)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: More Macweek Rumors
Message-ID: <7151@goofy.Apple.COM>
Date: 13 Mar 90 03:45:58 GMT
Sender: usenet@Apple.COM
Organization: Objects-R-Us,  Apple Computer, Inc.
Lines: 12
References:<CA277A1D519F40216C@UALR.BITNET> <1990Mar9.012908.23319@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> <1990Mar9.102100.3215@agate.berkeley.edu>

In article <1990Mar9.102100.3215@agate.berkeley.edu> 
c60c-3cw@web-3a.berkeley.edu writes:
>         MacWeek is contradicting itself. 

So?  Rumors don't have to be self-consistent.  Rumors are good for
entertainment, but not much else.

Larry Rosenstein, Apple Computer, Inc.
Object Specialist

Internet: lsr@Apple.com   UUCP: {nsc, sun}!apple!lsr
AppleLink: Rosenstein1