Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!hwcs!neil From: neil@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Forsyth) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: SIMMs for the STE Keywords: SIMM, STE, Message-ID: <4592@brahma.cs.hw.ac.uk> Date: 8 Mar 90 09:24:00 GMT References: <2703@erix.ericsson.se> <2069@atari.UUCP> <2668@castle.ed.ac.uk> Reply-To: neil@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Forsyth) Organization: Computer Science, Heriot-Watt U., Scotland Lines: 25 In article <2668@castle.ed.ac.uk> aimd@castle.ed.ac.uk (M Davidson) writes: >Obviously Atari never bothered to tell UK magazines that the SIMMS >weren't a feature of the machine so when they opened the machine SIMMS >were what they found - can you blame them for assuming this to be a >'feature' of the machine (rather like the square 68000 being a 'feature')? I do blame them! It's people making assumptions that have given the ST a bad name so far. Look at all the software that breaks on TOS 1.4 and 1.6 because of 'assumptions'. Unless Atari say so officially then nothing is guaranteed. If your STE has SIMMs, congratulations. If not, too bad, that's the luck of the draw. Does anyone think it unreasonable to ask a dealer to supply an STE that definately has SIMMs an not SIPs? I can't imagine many dealers opening them up for you to have a look. If SIP machines don't sell then Atari might change their policy but few buyers would ever be aware of the difference. +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! DISCLAIMER: Unless otherwise stated, the above comments are entirely my own ! ! ! ! Neil Forsyth JANET: neil@uk.ac.hw.cs ! ! Dept. of Computer Science ARPA: neil@cs.hw.ac.uk ! ! Heriot-Watt University UUCP: ..!ukc!cs.hw.ac.uk!neil ! ! Edinburgh, Scotland, UK "it's pronounced Throatgobbler Mangrove" ! +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+