Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!bloom-beacon!mintaka!think!samsung!usc!skat.usc.edu!acliu From: acliu@skat.usc.edu (Alex C. Liu) Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm Subject: Re: BBS programs for the C64 Message-ID: <23498@usc.edu> Date: 15 Mar 90 02:36:21 GMT References: <13448.25fc452c@max.u.washington.edu> <90073.115336JLB119@psuvm.psu.edu> Sender: news@usc.edu Organization: Maze Inc. Lines: 31 In article <90073.115336JLB119@psuvm.psu.edu> JLB119@psuvm.psu.edu writes: >AARGH! EBBS? All-American?! ST/R!! Excuse me while I puke! (WRETCH!) [ Comments on Those BBSes being .... deleted ] >try to get your hands on Deadlock BBS Construction Kit, CMBBS, SCBBS, or >Color 64 or 128. All of these are Color/Graphics, some 2400 baud but all >are 1200, Punter and XModem, mostly in BASIC for easy modification. > Another one that's pretty good is C-Net/DS-II. I've never worked with Well, what is wrong with those BBSes? The fact that YOU don't like them, doesn't make the programs useless. Somebody might like those. Besides, this is a Public Archive for Public Domain or freely distributable things. From the examples you mention, I KNOW that C-Net/DS-II is Copyrighted, thus cannot be put in an Archive. (Though, I have worked with C-Net v4.0 128, and I can say that is VERY GOOD program, supports 2400bd, and has PUnter, Xmodem, CG graphics and ANSI as well. And it is ML and BASIC, and it is very easy to modify. It is a very good program... but back to our regularly scheduled flame) If you recommend those programs so much, and they are public domain, why don't you do us a favor and submit them to the server huh? Stop complaining and DO SOMETHING! (Sorry for wasting bandwidth (wasted bandwidth, in Comp.sys.cbm?!?!?!) but I hate people that complain but don't contribute!) ______________________________________________________________________ Alex C. Liu | INTERNET: acliu%skat@usc.edu Voice: (213) 749-2730 | BITNET: acliu%skat@gamera Q-Link: Alejandro | UUCP: ...!usc!edu