Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!amdcad!pepsi!phil
From: phil@pepsi.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Expanded Memory Emulators, an opinions?
Keywords: EMS QEMM
Message-ID: <29450@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Date: 10 Mar 90 01:39:05 GMT
References: <881@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM> <29431@amdcad.AMD.COM> <5060@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Sender: news@amdcad.AMD.COM
Reply-To: phil@pepsi.AMD.COM (Phil Ngai)
Distribution: na
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 17

In article <5060@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> jmerrill@jarthur.Claremont.EDU (Confusion Reigns) writes:
|In article <29431@amdcad.AMD.COM> phil@pepsi.AMD.COM (Phil Ngai) writes:
|>386Max is in my opinion superior because they can loadhi device drivers
|>like Sun PC-NFS sockdrv.sys which QEMM-386 can not. I have not done
|>this but people say it works.
|
|What do you mean by this?  In case people get the wrong impression, QEMM CAN
|loadhi device drivers.  You just use loadhi.sys rather than loadhi.com.  Is
|there something special about sockdrv.sys that only 386Max can handle?

Yes. I should clarify and say that, yes, I do LOADHI drivers like
pcnfs.sys, ansi.sys, mouse.sys, etc. QD can not LOADHI sockdrv.sys.
(they said in response to my question) 386Max can (I hear).

--
Phil Ngai, phil@amd.com		{uunet,decwrl,ucbvax}!amdcad!phil
The Microsoft Mouse is the only mouse worth having on a PC.