Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!quiche!calvin!rossp
From: rossp@quiche.cs.mcgill.ca (Ross PORTER)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: 386max and windows386
Message-ID: <2480@calvin.cs.mcgill.ca>
Date: 14 Mar 90 16:10:23 GMT
References: <2562.25fbc856@esat.kuleuven.ac.be>
Reply-To: rossp@calvin.cs.mcgill.ca (Ross PORTER)
Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Lines: 10

In article <2562.25fbc856@esat.kuleuven.ac.be> maes@esat.kuleuven.ac.be writes:
>I am a user of 386max and of windows386. These two combine very badly. 

Conventional wisdom says use Windows/286, or at least Windows/386's
win86.com.  That way you have only one 386-aware program, and most of
the conflicts are gone.  Of course virtual-86 mode multi-tasking is
lost.  You have to decide which way you'll be more productive.

Ross Porter
rossp@calvin.cs.mcgill.ca