Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!bloom-beacon!mintaka!think!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!apple!sun-barr!decwrl!shelby!portia!nova.stanford.edu!dma
From: dma@nova.stanford.edu (Domingo Mihovilovic A)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Turbo C v/s Microsoft C
Keywords: C,Turbo C,Microsoft C
Message-ID: <10125@portia.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 13 Mar 90 18:07:16 GMT
Sender: USENET News System <news@portia.stanford.edu>
Reply-To: dma@nova.stanford.edu (Domingo Mihovilovic A)
Organization: Stanford University, Stanford CA
Lines: 11

Hi,
	I am planning to switch from Pascal to C, and I have the doubt
of Turbo or Microsoft. I would choose Borland because I have been
working with Turbo Pascal and it is very good.

	Do you know of some real and important differences that could move
me to select Microsoft C instead of Turbo C ?
	Thanks for your comments,

Domingo Mihovilovic A.
dma@scotty.stanford.edu