Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt:1493 comp.unix.aix:715
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!nghiem
From: nghiem@ut-emx.UUCP (Alex Nghiem)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt,comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: Benchmarks for IBM Risc/6000
Message-ID: <25911@ut-emx.UUCP>
Date: 12 Mar 90 05:34:45 GMT
References: <25834@ut-emx.UUCP> <1990Mar10.211340.13479@acheron.uucp>
Reply-To: nghiem@emx.UUCP (Alex Nghiem)
Organization: UTexas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 26

In article <1990Mar10.211340.13479@acheron.uucp> clarke@acheron.uucp (Ed Clarke/10240000) writes:

>of 1000000.  Benchmark should be run on a freshly re-booted system
>with all the normal ( sendmail, named, NFS, gettys, X11 ) tasks running
>but only one user ( not the same as 'single user maint mode' ).

The drystone 2.1 figures I posted earlier for the Sun 3, the NeXT, and 
the Vax were run in multiuser mode. These machines are NFS'ed together.
The tests on the RT 6150 Model 25 and Mac II A/UX were run in multiuser
mode, but without NFS. When I ran the tests, the Mac had two users, the Vax
had nine users, and the Sun 3 had about five users. I was the only user on
the RT and the NeXT.

The figure I got on the Next 1.0 machine (~5900 drystones )matches the
figure that was posted in the March, 1990 Byte article on Unix Benchmarks.

Does anybody know where I can ftp the latest Byte benchmarks?
__________________________________________________________________________
This article is posted for factual information only. Any misrepresentation,
if any, is purely unintentional. Any opinion expressed or implicit in
these remarks are solely my own.

nghiem@emx.utexas.edu
!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!nghiem
nghiem@walt.cc.utexas.edu
!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!walt!nghiem