Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!csinc!rpeglar
From: rpeglar@csinc.UUCP (Rob Peglar)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: 386sx
Summary: Ha ha.
Message-ID: <175@csinc.UUCP>
Date: 12 Mar 90 16:24:36 GMT
References: <12955@udenva.cair.du.edu> <7165@lynx.UUCP> <3000@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> <3060@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
Organization: Control Systems, Inc., St. Paul MN
Lines: 20

In article <3060@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>, morris@jade.jpl.nasa.gov (Mike Morris) writes:
(lots of stuff deleted)

> 
> And I can't imagine Intel designing a motherboard that wouldn't run right.

You're lucky you didn't try running Xenix 2.3.2GT on the early (beta)
revs of the Intel 303 motherboard ('386/33Mhz).  Wouldn't boot at all,
due to an interrupt handling problem.  I found the problem, passed it
along to SCO, who made it into an SLS (xnx151).  Intel has subsequently
rev'd the motherboard, and now all is well.

Kind of.

Rob
-- 
Rob Peglar	Control Systems, Inc.	2675 Patton Rd., St. Paul MN 55113
...uunet!csinc!rpeglar		612-631-7800

The posting above does not necessarily represent the policies of my employer.