Xref: utzoo news.groups:18522 comp.sys.mac:50143
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!Teknowledge.COM!unix!mxmora
From: mxmora@unix.SRI.COM (Matt Mora)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Comp.Sys.Mac reorg -- 2/23/90 update
Message-ID: <9917@unix.SRI.COM>
Date: 8 Mar 90 17:14:42 GMT
References: <38902@apple.Apple.COM> <38904@apple.Apple.COM> <710@dino.cs.iastate.edu> <10522@hoptoad.uucp> <1628.25ee76c8@csc.anu.oz> <2839@stl.stc.co.uk>
Reply-To: mxmora@unix.UUCP (Matt Mora)
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: SRI International, Menlo Park, CA
Lines: 26

>>In article <10522@hoptoad.uucp>, tim@hoptoad.uucp (Tim Maroney) writes:
>>> Well, it appears that my argument is being ignored.  That's too bad.
>>> I've made it twice before in my net career; both times it was ignored,
>>> and both times, it turned out to be correct.

I agree with Tim on this. I haven't been reading news long enough
to guess what might happen but human nature is bound to repeat itself.

Can we vote not to reorg? There are too many News groups for me to 
go through already. The "n" key works well for me. (but then again
I just started using Telnet and before that I had a 9600 baud connection).

Is there something else we can do?

I would hate to see comp.sys.mac turn into something I would no longer
care or have time to read.

My vote is to NOT reorg.



-- 
___________________________________________________________
Matthew Mora
SRI International                       mxmora@unix.sri.com
___________________________________________________________