Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tank!ncar!asuvax!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!cluster!yar From: yar@cs.su.oz (Ray Loyzaga) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mips Subject: Re: Experience with DAT drives? Message-ID: <766@cluster.cs.su.oz> Date: 13 Mar 90 22:55:36 GMT References: <1273@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de> <1990Mar11.160020.27837@sobeco.com> Sender: news@cluster.cs.su.oz Reply-To: yar@cluster.cs.su.oz (Ray Loyzaga) Distribution: comp Organization: Basser Dept of Computer Science, University of Sydney, Australia Lines: 30 In article <1990Mar11.160020.27837@sobeco.com> roe@sobeco.com (r.peterson) writes: > From article <1273@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de>, by k2@charly.bl.physik.tu-muenchen.de (Klaus Steinberger): > > has anybody tried to use a HP/Sony DAT Drive or a Wangtek drive > > on a MIPS System? > > However, both the transfer rate and storage capacity are about half the > exabyte. I have used a JVC DAT called a Gigatape, it plugs straight into the SCSI port and works well on the M/120, there seems to be a firmware mismatch once it is on the system that makes the M120 fail the cold boot diagnostics, this doesn't stop the device from being usable, but should be fixed by mips and the tape manufacturer ... The nice thing about this drive is that it has a display that gives constant info about what is going on, seeking, writing etc, with a number that increments as the tape is used, so you can get perfectly accurate numbers about how much of the tape has been written. The speed of writing was slower than the Exabyte, but certainly not by half, maybe 80% as fast, the real win is that the tape can do end to end seeks in 10-20 seconds, whereas the Exabyte is absolutely painful with each command. The Gigatype, being fully digital, will be more reliable and it does not lose sync due to a tape error e.g. If there is a media error early in the tape, the drive will still be able to find any later files without trouble. This is great for multi-machine backups and restores. In my opinion, the DAT style systems are much better to use for multi-file tape use, most of this comes from the speed of positioning. The major drawback being the requirement for pre-formatting the tape, which can take >3hours each. Maybe they will sell preformatted tapes? Or maybe they will get ones that format on the fly.