Xref: utzoo comp.unix.i386:3510 comp.unix.xenix:10556
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!sunic!uupsi!rpi!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!usc!randvax!edhall
From: edhall@rand.org (Ed Hall)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386,comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: BENCHMARKS (Byte's) 368 vs 486 comp.
Message-ID: <1990Mar11.223447.5645@rand.org>
Date: 11 Mar 90 22:34:47 GMT
References: <1990Mar8.175245.2527@pcrat.uucp> <1025@fiver.UUCP>
Sender: news@rand.org
Reply-To: edhall@ives.UUCP (Ed Hall)
Organization: The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
Lines: 15

In article <1025@fiver.UUCP> palowoda@fiver.UUCP (Bob Palowoda) writes:
>  Once again 25Mhz 386, pcc.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Without reg
>Dhrystones/sec:               5400             5400            141.14
>
>Dhrystone 2 using register variables
>Dhrystones/sec:               5709             5709            176.04

These still seem low.  On a no-name, UNcached, UNinterleaved 25MHz 386
I get a consistant 7085 with registers, 6825 without (+/- 15 or so).
This is with ISC 2.01 and pcc.

		-Ed Hall
		edhall@rand.org